From A to B and how.
A - Knowing where you are (current net
worth)
B - Where you want to be (amount of money you need to achieve
financial independence).
How – Family budgeting vs. Income
–Savings and where to invest.
These are the financial independence
basics. One would still need to have key performance indicators. For my plan
and portfolio I want to choose following:
-
Absolute
total return on invested cash. Expressed in dollars and percentage.
In
2012 the result was $5,4 K and 3%.
-
Relative
total return (measured against S&P 500)
3%
vs. 14% (S&P 500).
-
Inflation
adjusted return.
2012 inflation was 3%, hence adjusted
return was 0%.
-
Cash
accumulated to be invested (annual figure expressed in 2010 money).
$
51 K vs. $ 40K planned.
-
Assets
& currency allocation.
To
be developed. Moving in the right direction.
-
Personal
expectation.
After
getting acquainted with inflation, I lowered my expectation of early retirement
/financial independence. However this is
still a very important indicator.
Suppose
market performed well, but you did not manage to accumulate as much money as
planned – you still on target. Sometimes market was bearish or certain assets
underperformed, but accumulated cash compensated for it. You need to have your own understanding and
aspirations.
Value
|
Performance
indicator
|
Comments
|
|
Absolute return
|
$, K
|
%
|
|
5,4
|
3
|
||
Relative return
|
S&P 500, %
|
Portfolio, %
|
Missed opportunity due to overexposure
to cash.
|
14
|
3
|
||
Cash accumulated in 2010 money
|
Planned $, K
|
Actual $, K
|
|
40
|
51
|
||
Personal plan
in 2010 money
|
Planned $, K
|
Actual $, K
|
|
209
|
209
|
Financial
Independence KPIs should be part of any portfolio. Just to realize how you are
doing. Numbers are the name of the game.
Personal
expectations are critical. Sometime ago
I have realized that investing in mutual funds is a relatively safe bet due to
diversification of the portfolio. It
does not bring a lot of results.
For
me investing at $ 40 K a year in 2010 money terms (in 2013 this would mean $
45K) reaching financial independence would take 29 years (achieved in
2040).
There
is two basic assumptions: investments will bring 2% above inflation a year,
annual savings would go up by 1% , yet
again inflation adjusted.
Please
see below summary in a table format:
There
are three sub tables:
Actual
in money of the days – figures “as is” at the end of the year.
Actual
money – inflation adjusted to 2010 money.
Planned
in 2010 money – this is plan how to get from A to B and achieve $ 2 million dollars in 2010 money.
The
reason sticking with 2010 money not only symbolic or sentimental. I have
reliable data from 2010, otherwise it will always a moving target due to
external and internal inflation. By internal I mean increasing our family
budget without good reason. One more
point is that we recently moved to a more expensive area – while it is
providing as better employment opportunities, we are not planning to stay here
forever and pay 50% premium once financial independence is reached.
Financial
independence is when with your investments you could achieve two things:
-
Provide
for your annual expenses.
-
Accumulate
enough money to compensate principal for the inflation. In other words if last
year inflation was 3% and you have big enough nest egg to live on 3% a year,
you need to generate 8% income (additional 2% will go towards taxes on the
re-invested money).
This
is only sustainable way. Less risky
strategy – have a bigger nest egg, so you would need lower income (percentage
wise). For example with accumulated $ 6 million dollars you would only need to
generate 3% above inflation. In
comparison with example above 6% instead of 8.
In
a way it makes me more relaxed with understanding that additional $ 10 K a year could hardly make a big difference in
medium to short term. Remember we are talking about 25-30 years period.
Years
to achieve financial independence ( $ 2 million in 2010. All figures are in 2010
money, annual gain – inflation adjusted):
Years at $40 K
|
29
|
26
|
24
|
22
|
20
|
Years at $50 K
|
25
|
23
|
21
|
19
|
18
|
Years at $60 K
|
22
|
20
|
19
|
18
|
17
|
Years at $70 K
|
20
|
19
|
17
|
16
|
15
|
Interest, %
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
Assuming
that you will go for a safe bet. The better the market performs the less
difference it make (additional money put in).
Observations:
-
Increasing annual contributions from $40K to $70K buys you 9 years in low
growth scenario but only 5 in best case one.
-
What it could potentially mean that any savings in excess of annually planned $
42 K I may want to invest in more risky but potentially high return stocks.
- Saving additional $ 1 K year on small things
(coffee, etc..) and investing it will
not buy me an extra year in any scenario.
No comments:
Post a Comment