I
think that benchmarking, when used in the right context is a representative
reflection of affairs, especially in finance where it is numbers game. I analyzed
my portfolio performance and investment choices made.
These
are better presented in a table (all sum of money is in thousands):
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
Cumulative
|
21
|
140
|
202
|
215
|
303
|
303
|
Inflation adjusted
|
22
|
146
|
217
|
236
|
337
|
347
|
S&P500
|
23
|
173
|
265
|
280
|
412
|
440
|
Yearend value
|
20.7
|
141
|
169
|
167
|
316
|
304
|
Cumulative: The invested money added up
together.
Inflation
adjusted: The invested money adjusted
for the inflation and added up together (as if I would have invested in Treasury
Inflation Protected Securities aka TIPS).
S&P500: If I would invest money in
S&P500 (commissions are not included).
Yearend
value: Value of my portfolio at
the end of the year (including received dividends).
Here
is the same information presented on a chart and “how and why” this happened and what to do next.