Here is my current allocation at the beginning of respective years:
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
Aspired
|
Shares
|
15%
|
67%
|
51%
|
38%
|
10%
|
Index Funds
|
0%
|
0%
|
22%
|
30%
|
50%
|
Bonds
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
20%
|
30%
|
Precious metals
|
6%
|
4%
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
Cash
|
79%
|
29%
|
24%
|
9%
|
7%
|
Total, USD K
|
230
|
304
|
273
|
281
|
|
Developed economy
|
0%
|
0%
|
16%
|
27%
|
50%
|
Emerging market
|
15%
|
67%
|
57%
|
61%
|
40%
|
Liquid assets
|
85%
|
33%
|
27%
|
12%
|
10%
|
I am moving in the desired direction and the
plan is to keep investing mainly in index funds in developed economies and bond
index, this is to balance it towards more stable but less delivering assets. I
will also need to reduce my exposure to individual stocks, regardless how
attractive they may look. If I would
have extra cash to invest, perhaps I could tolerate elevated risk levels more
easily.
Thinking aloud: I am from millennials, or more prosaic -
generation rent. Graduate debt, poorer pension provision (if any) and a runaway
housing market are making my financial present a struggle, let alone the
financial future. However, we are (aged
between 18 and 35) are already the largest segment of the US workforce.
It
has been good 7 years, financially speaking. I tried to use extra income to
actively squirreling the money away, but now it is back to the reality.
How do you recognize us, apart from age?
- Home ownership at an all-time low among
this generation, we are a boon for buy-to-let landlords, typically flitting
about and staying in one place for not more than a year.
- Own stuff? We can’t afford to. The income
of the average 22- to 30-year-old remains stubbornly 8 per cent lower than it
was in 2008, says the UK’s Institute for Fiscal Studies. This income dip is
hitting the young the hardest — the income of the median UK household returned
to pre-recession level last year (8 years later and new recession is coming
fast).
- At best, millennials are likely to be
paying 5 per cent of their salary into a pension pot with another 10 per cent
contributed by their employer. Most of us paying nothing, as it not worth to feed
bankers and wealth managers.
Financial advisers and so-called wealth management is selling idea that
there is era of lower returns punctuated by frequent volatility threatens to
become the “new normal”, adding to the pressures to the clients. Of course, it
does not affect fees for their services. These will only go up, although most
of them could not outperform the index funds.
“In the past, we have seen equity returns at 8 per cent. It is likely to
be a lot lower, at between 3 and 5 per cent. People have to be accustomed to
that.”
Good move to get out of individual stocks as your portfolio continues to grow and you move to a more moderate risk profile. Individual stocks can offer great returns, but that also comes with a larger risk!
ReplyDeleteHi Derek,
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for stopping by. I could not agree with your more. Individual stocks, if carefully selected is a way to go. Investing in index funds provides less risk but mediocre results as well.
If I would have more available cash (above my annual targets) I would certainly invest in the carefully selected individual stock, to accelerate reach of financial independence.